skip to main content
UHY US
UHY header-overlay
Essential Metrics for an AI Governance Framework

11/18/24

News

Essential Metrics for an AI Governance Framework

4 Min Read

A key aspect of AI governance is the creation and implementation of evaluation metrics to assess the performance, security, fairness, and effect AI systems have within your organization. Without these metrics, you won’t have a complete understanding of how your AI initiatives are performing in real-world applications. In this article, we’ll delve into some of the essential metrics that can enhance your AI governance framework.

Performance metrics

Performance metrics are important for assessing how well an AI system fulfills its intended functions. It is crucial to employ a variety of performance metrics to ensure the system is not only effective, but also reliable, adaptable, and capable of future value. Some of the more common governance performance metrics include:

Simple accuracy: This metric assesses the frequency in which the AI system makes correct predictions. It is relevant for classification tasks, but may not provide a complete picture of overall performance, especially in cases where class imbalance occurs.

Precision and recall: Precision measures the accuracy of predictions made by the model, while recall measures the ability to find all relevant instances. Both are vital in scenarios such as medical diagnostics, where false positives or false negatives could have significant consequences.

Fairness and transparency metrics

Fairness and transparency metrics help identify and mitigate biases, ensuring equitable treatment and maintaining transparency in AI systems. Some common fairness and transparency metrics include:

Bias and variance: Bias refers to systematic errors in the AI system's predictions, while variance measures the system's sensitivity to fluctuations in the training data. Balancing bias and variance is critical for achieving fair and generalizable predictions.

Model explainability: This measures the extent to which the AI system's decisions and processes can be understood by stakeholders. Quality documentation is a simple and effective way to provide comprehensive transparency and facilitate auditing and accountability. Techniques such as SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) can also be used to explain the model's decisions in a more technical manner.

Ethical and social impact metrics

Evaluating the ethical and social impact of AI systems is essential to ensure they align with societal values and do not cause harm. Some common ethical and social impact metrics include:

Social acceptability and long-term impact: This measures public perception, acceptance, and the impact of an AI system's outcomes and processes. Engaging with stakeholders and conducting surveys can provide insights into societal attitudes and concerns. Tracking the effects of the AI system on society — such as its impact on organization employment, inequality, and cultural norms — can provide valuable insights into its long-term impact, which helps anticipate and mitigate unintended consequences.

Regulatory compliance: This evaluates whether the AI system adheres to relevant regulations and standards, such as GDPR for data protection or industry-specific guidelines. Compliance ensures that the system operates within legal boundaries.

Security metrics

In the world of AI, security cannot be overstated. AI systems, given their growing influence on critical decision-making processes, are increasingly targeted by bad actors. Security metrics ensure the protection of AI systems against vulnerabilities, attacks, and breaches. Key security metrics include:

Robustness against adversarial attacks: This metric evaluates a system’s resilience against adversarial attacks. For example, a tactic commonly known as "Jail Breaking" can happen when attackers intentionally manipulate input data to trick the AI system into making incorrect decisions.

Data integrity: Data integrity measures a system's ability to protect input data from tampering or corruption. Since AI systems depend on vast quantities of data for training and operation, maintaining data integrity is essential. Private instances of LLM's can be specifically targeted with incorrect information to influence the decision-making process.

Incident detection and response: This measures a system's ability to detect and respond to security breaches in real time. Identification and resolution of incidents are vital to minimizing damage and maintaining trust in the AI system.

Embracing metrics

A well-defined AI governance framework relies on comprehensive metrics to ensure that your AI systems are effective, fair, transparent, and ethically sound. To maintain a competitive advantage and control over your information technology, it's essential to understand how to track the impacts of your AI systems. By implementing and regularly evaluating these metrics, you can enhance your AI governance practices, foster trust, and align your AI initiatives with broader societal values and regulatory requirements.

Have a Question?

Fill out the form to connect with one of our professionals.

Join Our Mailing List

Sign Up Now
Uhy Logo

You are leaving UHY website to visit a site not hosted by UHY. Please review the third-party’s privacy policy, accessibility policy, and terms. UHY is not responsible for the content provided by third-party sites.